TD Bank just won a victory before Judge Marra in federal district court. Judge Marra ruled TD Bank has the right to have a jury trial conducted in the district court, not the bankruptcy court, because it did not consent to a bankruptcy court jury trial.
The only question is if they want to go before a jury ... and I don't only mean TD Bank. The elephant in the room throughout the whole Scott Rothstein bankruptcy is that Berger Singerman insiders, including Paul Singerman, partnered with Rothstein to buy Gibraltar Bank, arguably a bank more important to Rothstein's schemes then TD Bank.
Clearly, Berger Singerman insiders are presumed to have inside knowledge of Rothstein's scheme — through due dilligence and similar efforts used in evaluating their Gibraltar investment and their partner, Rothstein, who they were investing with.
At the time of the purchase all the warning signs were in place, including the many internal complaints about Rothstein's accounts. Rothstein has already testified that the key reason for his investing in Gibraltar Bank was to block all internal investigations of his accounts.
The conflict problem — so the public was informed and it was dutifully reported — was "solved" by hiring another law firm to sue Gibraltar. The problem then disappeared from public view, as "solved."
But, the conflict problem was never solved because Gibraltar played a central role in the Ponzi scheme. Berger Singerman had retained such a degree of control over the bankruptcy estate that Paul Singerman negotiated the sweetheart Gibraltar bankruptcy settlement that immunizes Gibraltar from other claims by Rothstein's victims — and protects Berger Singerman insiders' investment in Gibraltar.
The ploy of hiring another firm to give the appearance of a "solved" conflict, worked very well indeed.
TD Bank's "Best Defense" - What Happened To The In Pari Delicto Defense ... It Worked In The Madoff Case?
It is so far very strange that the issue of "in pari delicto" has not yet hit any headlines in this case (See my previous post on this subject). Remember, that well settled defense theory says, in essence, that if two parties work together on a scheme, then one of those schemers (in this case the bankruptcy estate) cannot sue third parties on behalf of innocent victims.
To make the in pari delicto concept clearer: picture two muggers assaulting a victim. One of the muggers sues another alleged accomplice to the mugging to compensate the victim. The sued alleged accomplice raises the in pari delicto defense claiming an accomplice cannot sue him to compensate the victim.
This very important defense issue, a few days ago, became the subject of an appeal in the Second Circuit in the Bernie Madoff bankruptcy case. The appeal came after two Madoff bankruptcy trustee lawsuits against financial institutions were thrown out based on the in pari delicto defense. Those cases parallel the Scott Rothstein case against TD Bank.
Everyone following the Scott Rothstein bankruptcy case should recognize what is really happening:
Berger Singerman is making many quick "pennies on the dollar" settlements. Those paltry settlements all have buried clauses that immunize the targets from victim lawsuits — the real "carrot" to settle. A large part of those paltry settlements then go to Berger Singerman for legal fees — and Berger Singerman is thereby able to protect themselves (and friends) from many embarrassing questions and potential civil claims, including aiding and abetting and civil RICO claims, regarding Gibraltar.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Raj Rajaratnam Convicted ... But Local Bankruptcy Insiders Helped Bear Stearns — the "Big One" — Get Away
No conviction could have been simpler to obtain than one for the theft of massive amounts of wiretap information and other protected law enforcement materials ... that was engineered, for Bear Stearns benefit, by local bankruptcy insiders and Bear Stearns senior management.
Convictions of senior Bear Stearns managing directors Mark Lehman and Daniel Taub would have been so simple. And, through the leverage of Bear Stearns senior management facing long prison terms, have led to a successful outcome — instead of the notorious botched result — in the Bear Stearns Cayman Islands CMO Hedge Fund trial ... a trial that otherwise had to rely on ambiguous emails.
In 2006, Paul S. Singerman of Berger Singerman confessed to being instrumental in funneling a flood of illegal wiretap results and other extensive protected law enforcement materials (he euphemistically termed "discovery") to Bear Stearns:
"one of the purposes of Title Ill is to prevent unlawful communications intercepts being used for "private financial gain" .... Sharing the contents of the discovery ... with Lawrence's largest creditor— Bear Stearns & Co. ... was entirely appropriate so that they could determine what, if anything, in the discovery obtained might be useful to them"
The open and shut simplicity of a prosecution of Bear Stearns senior management — for serious violations of federal wiretap law — would have prevented Bear Stearns' later 30 billion dollar sale of worthless CMO's from their Cayman Islands hedge funds to the U.S. taxpayer. That sale would have been politically impossible.
From late 2004 on, even before Paul S. Singerman's confession was made, I had filed extensive documentation, including hidden bills, that plainly showed the thefts were routinely occurring. The documentation showed how Bear Stearns was regularly funneled the massive amount law enforcement material they were illegally receiving. It was that documentation then led to the confession by Mr. Singerman in court papers.
A successful prosecution of Bear Stearns insiders was a much simpler matter than the Raj Rajaratnam conviction — itself, the Wall Street Journal identified as having a "simple" prosecution theory as the reason for its success — because the theory was basic and so easy to prove since a confession already existed.
The means to convict senior Bear Stearns management had been filed (and sent to the local U.S. Attorney's Office in Florida) in more than enough time to prevent the greatest con in US financial history: the 30 billion dollar sale of worthless CMO's held in Bear Stearns' Cayman Islands hedge funds — the very CMO's Bear Stearns insiders made billions creating — to the US taxpayer.
This far dwarfed the 20 million dollar insider case of Raj Rajaratnam.
Of course there is much more to this story, as hinted at in the Paul Singerman confession. Particularly the strange manner, theories, and events by which the illegal wiretapping was obtained and justified. All of these matters, presenting a far different picture than previously publicized about the longest civil contempt case in US federal court history, has begun to be fully documented in this blog.
Confession by Paul S. Singerman that Bear Stearns illegally obtained federal law enforcement tapes
Convictions of senior Bear Stearns managing directors Mark Lehman and Daniel Taub would have been so simple. And, through the leverage of Bear Stearns senior management facing long prison terms, have led to a successful outcome — instead of the notorious botched result — in the Bear Stearns Cayman Islands CMO Hedge Fund trial ... a trial that otherwise had to rely on ambiguous emails.
In 2006, Paul S. Singerman of Berger Singerman confessed to being instrumental in funneling a flood of illegal wiretap results and other extensive protected law enforcement materials (he euphemistically termed "discovery") to Bear Stearns:
"one of the purposes of Title Ill is to prevent unlawful communications intercepts being used for "private financial gain" .... Sharing the contents of the discovery ... with Lawrence's largest creditor— Bear Stearns & Co. ... was entirely appropriate so that they could determine what, if anything, in the discovery obtained might be useful to them"
The open and shut simplicity of a prosecution of Bear Stearns senior management — for serious violations of federal wiretap law — would have prevented Bear Stearns' later 30 billion dollar sale of worthless CMO's from their Cayman Islands hedge funds to the U.S. taxpayer. That sale would have been politically impossible.
From late 2004 on, even before Paul S. Singerman's confession was made, I had filed extensive documentation, including hidden bills, that plainly showed the thefts were routinely occurring. The documentation showed how Bear Stearns was regularly funneled the massive amount law enforcement material they were illegally receiving. It was that documentation then led to the confession by Mr. Singerman in court papers.
A successful prosecution of Bear Stearns insiders was a much simpler matter than the Raj Rajaratnam conviction — itself, the Wall Street Journal identified as having a "simple" prosecution theory as the reason for its success — because the theory was basic and so easy to prove since a confession already existed.
The means to convict senior Bear Stearns management had been filed (and sent to the local U.S. Attorney's Office in Florida) in more than enough time to prevent the greatest con in US financial history: the 30 billion dollar sale of worthless CMO's held in Bear Stearns' Cayman Islands hedge funds — the very CMO's Bear Stearns insiders made billions creating — to the US taxpayer.
This far dwarfed the 20 million dollar insider case of Raj Rajaratnam.
Of course there is much more to this story, as hinted at in the Paul Singerman confession. Particularly the strange manner, theories, and events by which the illegal wiretapping was obtained and justified. All of these matters, presenting a far different picture than previously publicized about the longest civil contempt case in US federal court history, has begun to be fully documented in this blog.
Confession by Paul S. Singerman that Bear Stearns illegally obtained federal law enforcement tapes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)